You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a question, is there any difference between a Schwinn heavyweight and middleweight springer? if so? what are the visible differences? Thanks! Chris
I went and looked at the ones I have.the pivot behind the legs was 54 and earlier,so all later forks have the pivot bolt through the legs.There wasn't any obvious differences that I could see,but my eyes aren't so great.hopefully someone can say for sure or I'll be taking them down for closer comparison.
No difference regarding MW or HW. As mentioned above, the design changed in '54, meaning that the Middleweights were only ever spec'd with the bolt-through-leg style springers. You can toss an early style bolt-behind-leg springer on a Middleweight, it'll fit and function just fine, just note that the fender mount hole will have to be re-drilled.
Cheers, Geoff
I don't think so, not with the early springers. Get an aftermarket springer with the hole in the bottom of the steer tube if you want to use the caliper brake. There was a retrofit bracket that was use to mount a caliper brake on the Schwinn blade fork that wasn't drilled but I really doubt it will work on an old springer.
Below is a selection of springers that illustrate what Schwinn offered over the years.
The 1st. photo shows left to right a pre war "super" locking springer , early post war non locking, Later post war locking, Phantom locking and non locking ;last but least a 1995 re issue phantom locking.
Worth noting that the super springer has a greater curve to the upper fork ends .photo #2
photo 2 and 3 has a post war fork along side of it for comparison. If that "restored" pre war Motor bike you want to purchase doesn't have the curved fork arms and both fork axle slots are open and "fat" truss rods..... well I'am just saying......
the last photo shows how to tell a re issued 1995 springer: the fork tube weld[ that's about 2 inches up from the crown] is not ground smooth, and the lock is kinda cheapo. Other then that it was well made and hard to tell from the original.
sorry I don't have any of the late 50's springers to illustrate. Hope this helps.Also note the re issued 1995 springer had a "stiffer" spring in it....a good thing.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.