A bike does not have to be 100% correct to be restored no more than a car does that's whatever your personal desires are, and everyone has a different idea, level or definition of it. Back in the 70's, 80's and 90's everybody wanted restored bikes and the trend shifted to everyone wanting original along with the rat rod cars becoming popular. The paint today is 100 times more durable than enamel ever was. A very nice original should stay as is or if you like the rat look keep it that way. Everyone is so worried about the parts being same as when it was built, 100% correct, but the appearance does not look the same as when it was built. But a bike that looks as it did new or close no matter what, is always much more of an attention getter, and actually would look much closer to when it was built to the average person. The point of this forum is that it's like it's a mission for people to rip any restored bike to shreds unless it's by one of the elite people, no offense to them as most of them are very humble and nice. I see so many people post a bike they restored-fixed up and it's like pearl harbor day, when they themselves have never even attempted painting or anything like that. Many people just bolt on parts or buy done bikes, no matter what a person posts I try to be respectful to their effort. Otherwise, we just chase away people from this hobby and it will die off. The discussion on this is always interesting for sure. Like Freqman1 said some bikes you would never be able to own or wouldn't be ridable if not restored and bikes are meant to be ridden, enjoyed and shown off.