When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

A Couple Of Questions For The Historians

#eBayPartner    Most Recent BUY IT NOW Items Listed on eBay
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture

bulldog1935

Cruisin' on my Bluebird
history_of_bicycles_in_war11.jpg

https://bsamuseum.wordpress.com/beginnings-of-war-machines/

Did military R&D, specifications and purchasing contribute to development of the bicycle in the 19th century?
Any idea of size or significance of military purchases in the total bicycle market of the times?
Thanks in advance for your efforts.
 
No. There was total resistance by the military authorities to bicycles. Top brass were cavalry men. Bicycles were challenging horses as individual transportation in civilian life, so they thought that bicycles might replace horses. All military cyclists were volunteers. Two primary hobbies for blokes in the late Victorian era were cycling and playing at being soldiers. It wasn't until WW1 that bicycles were used extensively. The irony for the cavalry is that in WW1 bicycles worked alongside cavalry (as did motorcycles). But many of the (tall) cavalrymen were transferred to become crew for the new-fangled (low-roofed) tanks
 
Back
Top