Your point? Arguing for the sake of arguing?
Chicago Cycle Supply Company (and I'll bet ANY money you don't have anywhere near as many of their original catalogues as we do)
was not a car company. AND... those headbadges you refer to don't say "GENERAL MOTORS" on them. They also don't say "CADILLAC DIVISION" on them. And these bicycles were not sold at car dealerships. They were sold by ChiCyCo.
AND... as I said, Shelby Cycle Company also sold CADILLAC bicycles as one of their alternative brands. And GM had zero to do with selling these. Yes, we own a Shelby-Made Cadillac bicycle. Restored it in the 1980s (I know some consider this ancient history). Cleveland Welding Company also made some CADILLAC bicycles.
Just because W-D bicycle companies, manufacturers and even dealers were playing off of the rep of car names means what? I have matchbooks and souvenirs from stays at the LaSalle Hotel in Chicago.... does that mean that GM owned the hotel and sent the maids to clean the rooms? How silly do we have to get???? A Huffy Eldorado is not a Cadillac car, for heaven's sake! They didn't selll them at Cadillac dealers. And I own a REAL 1966 Cadillac Fleetwood Eldorado. These bicycles were STILL not sold by car dealers or connected to car companies on any official level. Get over it.
My LAST comment on this outrageous absurdity. No more arguing about this silly topic. If the hobby chooses to stick its collective head in the sand... go do that. But it still doesn't change the facts.
Here is just one of our many ChiCyCo W-D catalogues... this one from 1938. Below it are a CWC-made CADILLAC and a Shelby-Made CADILLAC headbadge. Dare I say I got these in the 1970s?
You're welcome.
Leon Dixon
National Bicycle History Archive of America
(NBHAA.com)
View attachment 1855921
View attachment 1855924
View attachment 1855925