When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Official Firestone - Fleetwood Supreme Thread

Most Recent BUY IT NOW Items Listed on eBay
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture

NBHAA

National Bicycle History Archive of America
For many years I have wondered why my Fleetwood wasn’t
two-toned like the others.
It appears that the white paint has been removed. There is still some evidence of it.
Unfortunately I also found out that the chain guard is incorrect.
View attachment 1875684

View attachment 1875685

View attachment 1875686
Hello...

In response to the long list of folks making claims and counter-claims and stating what is and isn't correct, I will make this one post. I do this because I can see this being argued into the ground and those arguments on here are usually followed by or accompanied by insults that imply that real facts are the myths... and the myths are only believable if uttered/posted by big shooters on this site. And there is no way to win with actual facts, especially against large numbers who will drink the Kool-Aid... only as long as that Kool-Aid comes from an approved source.

There are those who will merely read this and WHILE reading, already be formulating their comeback zinger argument. All of which will never result in raising anyone's knowledge level. But this apparently does not matter.

So. I can only say that the things being stated here in this thread are largely in error. Even when I am quoted, it is in error. For instance, I never owned Huffman-made streamliners from a "rental fleet." But I did indeed own more of these bicycles than any single human being breathing today. I believe the green one with original paint was once one of mine. As were others. This is a fact.

And I still own more literature and original papers on these bicycles than anyone. I also restored one long years, LONG YEARS before anyone else ever did. So, no matter who may troll this, I know a few things about these bicycles.

A few points to consider...

1.) The notion that a Huffman streamliner is either a Firestone (with straight bars) or a Dayton/Huffman/Snell/etc.etc.etc.etc. (with bent bars) is a complete fallacy.

2.) A few illustrations out of Firestone consumer catalogues is NOT the be-all, end-all of information about these bicycles. For that, you need the DEALER BOOKS and dealer letters. And promotional model info. And you need this information not just from Firestone, but from all of the retailers and wholesale-distributors who handled these bicycles. NONE of the folks making proclamations on here have gathered such information or they would not be making the proclamations made here.

3.) There were dozens and dozens of various brands that these bicycles were retailed under. NOT just Firestone. And there were sale/promotional models.

4.) The reference to these bicycles of "Super Streamline" was indeed used IN and OUTside of Huffman as a generic term for models with this frame... bent bars or not. Think of the term as you might with "J.C. Higgins "jet-flow."

5.) The "ashtray' name given to the factory accessory speedometer housing was not something that a "we" dreamed up. It was a "me" name... not a "we" name.

6.) There were dozens and dozens of variations of models sold using these frames. Nobody (including me) has ever tracked down and compiled and compared all that were sold and the details of each incarnation.

7.) There were numerous front sprockets for these bicycles. Not just what people think today. The one most people default to is what I always called the "flying bananas" but it certainly was not the only one.

8.) I was the first to display any of these bicycles at major museums. My special Firestone Fleetwood "Stainless Edition" with original stainless steel fenders, twin headlights, speedometer, etc. was displayed in the 1980s at Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Robert Huffman (who I visited with many times and interviewed) came to visit the exhibition and was very much impressed by my bicycle. So much so that he wrote a note to the museum curator to thank me. Yes. I still have the note.

Nobody knows? It's a mystery? If it makes everyone happy to believe such things, then be my guest!

I am including a shot of the Firestone bicycle dealer book binder (which is full).

Also including an image of just a few of the "super streamline" frames I had in the 1970s-1980s. If you insist... and because none of you ever interviewed people in the companies (Firestone and Huffman) who were there when these bicycles were new. If you look really close, you may even notice a frame with an original stainless steel rear fender still attached. And yes, there were W-D models of these bicycles WITH stainless steel fenders (no, the fork was not original). And more.

Finally a photo of my Firestone Fleetwood special edition with some of my other bicycles taken during setting up for an exhibit at L.A. County Museum of Art. The exhibit was part of a show entitled "The Machine Age."

Facts on old bicycle DIY forums are often like pouring gasoline on an ashtray. But... it is what it is.

Now. Have at it, arguers...

Leon Dixon
National Bicycle History Archive of America
(NBHAA.com)

FirestoneDealerbookDataWM.jpeg




LeonDixonBicyclesLACountyMuseOfArt WM.jpg


Leon'sHuffmans1980s.jpg
 
Last edited:

kreika

Cruisin' on my Bluebird
Hello...

In response to the long list of folks making claims and counter-claims and stating what is and isn't correct, I will make this one post. I do this because I can see this being argued into the ground and those arguments on here are usually followed by or accompanied by insults that imply that real facts are the myths... and they myths are only believable if uttered/posted by big shooters on this site. And there is no way to win with actual facts, especially against large numbers who will drink the Kool-Aid... only as long as that Kool-Aid comes from an approved source.

There are those who will merely read this and WHILE reading, be formulating their comeback zinger argument. All of which will never result in raising anyone's knowledge level. But that apparently does not matter.

So. I can only say that the things being stated here in this thread are largely in error. Even when I am quoted, it is in error. For instance, I never owned Huffman-made streamliners from a "rental fleet." But I did indeed own more of these bicycles than any single human being breathing today. I believe the green one with original paint was once one of mine. As were others. This is a fact.

And I still own more literature and original papers on these bicycles than anyone. I also restored one long years, LONG YEARS before anyone else ever did. So, no matter who may troll this, I know a few things about these bicycles.

A few points to consider...

1.) The notion that a Huffman streamliner is either a Firestone (with straight bars) or a Dayton/Huffman/Snell/etc.etc.etc.etc. (with bent bars) is a complete fallacy.

2.) A few illustrations out of Firestone consumer catalogues is NOT the be-all, end-all of information about these bicycles. For that, you need the DEALER BOOKS and dealer letters. And promotional model info. And you need this information not just from Firestone, but from all of the retailers and wholesale-distributors who handled these bicycles. NONE of the folks making proclamations on here have gathered such information or they would not be making the proclamations made here.

3.) There were dozens and dozens of various brands that these bicycles were retailed under. NOT just Firestone. And there were sale/promotional models.

4.) The reference to these bicycles of "Super Streamline" was indeed used IN and OUTside of Huffman as a generic term for models with this frame... bent bars or not. Think of the term as you might with "J.C. Higgins "jet-flow."

5.) The "ashtray' name given to the factory accessory speedometer housing was not something that a "we" dreamed up. It was a "me" name... not a "we" name.

6.) There were dozens and dozens of variations of models sold using these frames. Nobody (including me) has ever tracked down and compiled and compared all that were sold and the details of each incarnation.

7.) There were numerous front sprockets for these bicycles. Not just what people think today. The one most people default to is what I always called the "flying bananas" but it certainly was not the only one.

8.) I was the first to display any of these bicycles at major museums. My special Firestone Fleetwood "Stainless Edition" with original stainless steel fenders, twin headlights, speedometer, etc. was displayed in the 1980s at Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Robert Huffman (who I visited with many times and interviewed) came to visit the exhibition and was very much impressed by my bicycle. So much so that he wrote a note to the museum curator to thank me. Yes. I still have the note.

Nobody knows? It's a mystery? If it makes everyone happy to believe such things, then be my guest!

I am including a shot of the Firestone bicycle dealer book binder (which is full).

Also including an image of just a few of the "super streamline" frames I had in the 1970s-1980s. If you insist... and because none of you ever interviewed people in the companies (Firestone and Huffman) who were there when these bicycles were new. If you look really close, you may even notice a frame with an original stainless steel rear fender still attached. And yes, there were W-D models of these bicycles WITH stainless steel fenders (no, the fork was not original). And more.

Finally a photo of my Firestone Fleetwood special edition with some of my other bicycles taken during setting up for an exhibit at L.A. County Museum of Art. The exhibit was part of a show entitled "The Machine Age."

Facts on old bicycle DIY forums are often like pouring gasoline on an ashtray. But... it is what it is.

Now. Have at it, arguers...

Leon Dixon
National Bicycle History Archive of America
(NBHAA.com)

View attachment 1907533



View attachment 1907537

View attachment 1907538
I own one of these bikes. I’ve made no claims, and I love to learn. I wish you could give more factual history, and diagrams. More pictures. Conversations you had with people that were there. Instead it feels like an attack and a belittling at the same time. If you’ve been in this hobby for so long. How do any comments even bother you? Why not just lay it out as you know it, and let others make of it as they please. If you or they disagree. So be it, who cares. I just hope you’re working on a history of the bicycle book or chronicles. Hate to see this much gathered information lost to time, if something happened to you. Please pass on history. Don’t let it be lost. I always read your comments. This is not a negative oriented post either. If you’re the godfather of 20th century bicycle history please document it and share it with future generations.
Thank you so much , Chris
 

mrg

Riding a '38 Autocycle Deluxe
I own one of these bikes. I’ve made no claims, and I love to learn. I wish you could give more factual history, and diagrams. More pictures. Conversations you had with people that were there. Instead it feels like an attack and a belittling at the same time. If you’ve been in this hobby for so long. How do any comments even bother you? Why not just lay it out as you know it, and let others make of it as they please. If you or they disagree. So be it, who cares. I just hope you’re working on a history of the bicycle book or chronicles. Hate to see this much gathered information lost to time, if something happened to you. Please pass on history. Don’t let it be lost. I always read your comments. This is not a negative oriented post either. If you’re the godfather of 20th century bicycle history please document it and share it with future generations.
Thank you so much , Chris
I've been waiting for those books for 30+ years, I'm sure enough material for a different book for each manufacturer, we would all love some real info even if its not free!, $$$ waiting as soon as they are off the presses!
 

prewarbikes4sale

I live for the CABE
One thing to note on these Fleetwood Supremes, is the distinct chainguard for these models.
These bikes tend to get pieced together, since complete originals are few and far between, and the pesky little 3 rib Firestone chainguard is one of the hardest parts to find.
The bracket that clamped around the chainstay was just held on to the guard by a spot weld, and once that gave out, the original owners tended to just remove the guard altogether.
So, finding one of these bikes with its original guard intact, is a major stroke of luck.
Since it’s more likely, that you’ll be looking for one of these guards, note the difference between the Firestone Fleetwood Supreme guard

View attachment 1858348
Many restored Fleetwood Supremes ended up getting the Twin Flex type guard as they are a little easier to find.
It’s a subtle detail, that often gets over looked, but just one of the many features that make these Fleetwood Supremes unique.
I’m curious why does this show the Streamliner
With the “Twinflex guard”? Am I missing something?
IMG_3825.png
 
Last edited:

cyclingday

I'm the Wiz, and nobody beats me!
I’m curious why does this show the Streamliner
With the “Twinflex guard”? Am I missing something?

View attachment 1907567
Because the artist rendering in the 1938 consumer catalog, is a facsimile of the bike that was actually produced?
So, neither that Twin Flex type Firestone chainguard, or that curved rear Super Streamline, stay frame, has ever shown up on an original as found, factory equipped Firestone Fleetwood Supreme.
At least, not yet!
Always willing to adjust that school of thought, when the factual proof of its existence is “presented.”
Apparently, there’s a mountain of evidence that exists in this vast literature and catalog collection, that proves every statement in thread to be wrong or in error.
But, if that stuff never gets posted publicly, then the only thing we do it yourselfers, have to go on, is the actual record, of as found, factory originally equipped bikes.
Nothing written in this thread, is written in stone, it can all be adjusted as time marches on.
That’s why we are all here.
To share our experience with these magnificent bikes, and expand our knowledge on what we think we know about them.
Anything new, that changes that school of thought, is always welcome.
Please share what you’ve discovered.
 

Freqman1

Riding a '37 Dayton Super Streamline
Because the artist rendering in the 1938 consumer catalog, is a facsimile of the bike that was actually produced?
So, neither that Twin Flex type Firestone chainguard, or that curved rear Super Streamline, stay frame, has ever shown up on an original as found, factory equipped Firestone Fleetwood Supreme.
At least, not yet!
Always willing to adjust that school of thought, when the factual proof of its existence is “presented.”
Apparently, there’s a mountain of evidence that exists in this vast literature and catalog collection, that proves every statement in thread to be wrong or in error.
But, if that stuff never gets posted publicly, then the only thing we do it yourselfers, have to go on, is the actual record, of as found, factory originally equipped bikes.
Nothing written in this thread, is written in stone, it can all be adjusted as time marches on.
That’s why we are all here.
To share our experience with these magnificent bikes, and expand our knowledge on what we think we know about them.
Anything new, that changes that school of thought, is always welcome.
Please share what you’ve discovered.
Amen Brother!
 
Top