The best post here is 2jakes showing the Cycling magazine article about moto-bikes. I could have written it myself. The appearance of the moto-bike on the market signaled the end of the bicycles that were cutting-edge transportation and technology and the birth of the bicycle as just another fashionable pile of consumer-goods marketed to the shallow-minded who were caught in consumerism and fashion-trends. It signaled the change in the motivation of manufacturers to design the best machinery from the best materials to designing what was fashionable out of very average and cheap materials. Real cyclists will always choose a bike that puts performance first over fashion. The moto-bikes and fat-tire bikes appeal to the same sort of people now that they appealed to when they first appeared in the late teens, not real cyclists but materialists and hipsters who got their security from owning something that was trendy. The true TOC bikes, those that pre-date the late-teens and moto-bikes were the golden-age of cycling in the USA, after that everything was just fashionable, cheap consumer-goods motivated by corporate profits, except for the very, very few hand-made bikes actually used by real racers and cyclists. The only badge that should be on the head of any moto-bike or fat-tire bike, muscle-bike etc. is "Game Over".