When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

The Tetanus Special-- A Bean Son Cadilac

#eBayPartner    Most Recent BUY IT NOW Items Listed on eBay
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
NBHAA Thank you for sharing the information above.

I have copies of the same catalogs that the NBHAA shows above. They are from the 1960s. The catalogs are large, and Bean sold a wide variety of parts from many manufacturers, Schwinn being a small part. The 1917 letterhead is interesting, it is possibly the earliest Bean document that I have seen. Especially interesting that it lists Cadilac. Hopefully the NBHAA can take a look at any other Bean documents that it has to tell us when Bean started to distribute Schwinn. As someone that tries to collect SF Bay Area bicycle stuff, I think it is interesting that over the years, I have found many more badges than bikes. There is even one seen here on the cabe that has been placed on a bike that is not a Bean, but a Reading. Don't be misled...

The author of this thread wants to know the year of his bike. It is very similar to my Bean LaSalle which if the wheels are original, I think they are, has a pre date code Morrow coaster brake which makes it 1930 or earlier. My Cadilac has had its serial number filed off and it did not come with parts that are very helpful in establishing a date. For all of these bikes, I would say 1915 - 1930 +-
You are very welcome. We are happy to supply information. But we can't haul out and post every Bean Son item we have just to extinguish all arguments and reveal every possible detail.

CABE is a haven for arguments and arguing. As we said, Bean Son Company was a Schwinn distributor FOR A WHILE. But only for a while. We really don't want to do an entire discertation on the phenomenon of wholesale-distributors vs. official Schwinn distributors along with the whens and wherefores, dates and how the entire history of BCSO and Schwinn and W-D bicycle companies worked in the USA. This is a ginormous amount of data and investigation.

The hobby– as it exists today– clearly does not understand either about bicycle wholesale-distributors, how these related to Arnold, Schwinn & Company, how the different brand names evolved and what they did or did not mean. And when all these things happened and didn't happen. It is useless to make statements because someone will simply jump up and go, "AHAH! !!!!" And then they will present what they imagine is "evidence" to support their argument... which may SEEM supportive, but only SEEMS supportive.

There really was no such thing as a "BEAN" bicycle– even if some actually had a headbadge that said "BEAN" or "BEAN SON" or were subtitled so. Why? Because Bean Son was a WHOLESALE-DISTRIBUTOR. They were not a bicycle manufacturer. Therefore whatever bicycles they W-D'd were always made by somebody else.

Like the Monark and Huffy folks who will post up a trade magazine press release story about Monark and Huffy.... a story that today's DIY folks clearly do not fully understand. Nor do these people know any of the background behind what actually happened at that time. But this does not stop them from going..."Ahah! We've got this ALL figured out!!! And NBHAA is WRONG!"

The same goes for today's DIY-ers arguing about how Schwinn invented balloon tires (they didn't). Or serial number freaks and their serial number arguments... "AHAH! But I've got a serial number list that shows... " And on and on.

We've been doing this stuff with American bicycle history for a while. Back in the 1970s we were discussing Monarks in the first newsletter for these types of bicycles: Classic Bicycle & Whizzer News. In a correspondence with a fellow who imagined himself an expert of Monarks, we included a very accurate image of a Monark. It was equipped and shown with what yours truly coined as a "pedestal headlight." You guessed it... then came an arguer. "You're WRONG! I gotta Xerox copy out of a Firestone catalogue showing TWIN-TORPEDO HEADLIGHTS on Monark!!!!! You're WRONG!!!!!"

Of course what this arguer did not understand was that MONARKS and FIRESTONE SUPER CRUISERS MADE BY MONARK were two different bicycles. Of course we had the literature for both. BUT... the arguer felt confident that HE had shown us up. And in his mind, proved us wrong!

So? Near fifty (50) years go by... and not much has changed.

Leon Dixon
National Bicycle History Archive of America
(NBHAA.com)
 
Thanks Leon, I hope you are doing well,

I understand the feeling of not wanting to get into arguments with people who think that they know what they are talking about. I have only been collecting and studying bikes since the very late 70s, I really got into it in the 80s, anyway...

Instead of calling them Bean bicycles, it is more accurate to say Bean branded bicycles. From what I have and have seen, at least so far, they were all from the teens and twenties and were made by the same manufacturer. Perhaps the manufacturer applied the Bean decals and badges or maybe Bean did after they were delivered without branding...

I also have Ohrt bicycles with Ohrt badges and decals that say San Francisco. these were made in the 40s in France, perhaps by Oscar Egg.

I also have this remnant of a San Francisco Hill Climber, which I think, may have actually been made in SF.


Happy Trails!
Chris
 
I have a few photos of Bean sold bicycles, but I don't know the manufacturers of all of them. Here you go.

Bean 28 inch Emblem built bicycle , owned by Kevintothej
View attachment 2081167

View attachment 2081168

I don't know who owns this one, or who made it
View attachment 2081170

View attachment 2081171

Owner and manufacturer unknown
View attachment 2081173

View attachment 2081175
Thanks for sharing these images. The first one is especially helpful for the author of this thread. Since his fenders are different than the ones on my Cadilac and LaSalle, I think it confirms that his fenders might be correct for his bike...
The second bike is the LaSalle, which I have and the third is very similar to my Angelus https://thecabe.com/forum/threads/teens-f-m-jones-angelus-bicycle.91239/#post-577048
 
Another interesting catalog page I found in my Bean Son research file. It was all by itself, so I don't know the year.

bsco badges.jpg
 
Finally got it all apart. Now it’s bath time!

View attachment 2081505
Was wondering if the crankset cones might have been the Emblem Angola 2-sided type?

If side 1 looks like side 2 (the flip side), then the cones would be reversible.

Looks like a nice project.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top