When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Informal poll

#eBayPartner    Most Recent BUY IT NOW Items Listed on eBay
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture
eBay Auction Picture

Guinness

Look Ma, No Hands!
Being very new to the hobby of vintage bikes, what’s the general consensus about cleaning-up a bike to “maintained, rideable, and original condition” as opposed to ”full-blown, looks like it just rolled-out the bike shop door” condition?

I’ve been enjoying the various “before & after” topics on the forum and it would appear that it’s a matter of the actual bike in question, but otherwise, there seems to be roughly a 50/50 split.

But which way, in general, do you lean?

-Guinness
 
Preservation is my #1 goal. If a bike has deteriated to the point of non recognition, a full restore could be a possibility. Things are only original once. Saving it from being scrap is still better than letting it be crushed. Just my personal outlook. Save what I can.
 
Back
Top