I don't think you can ascribe that to a given year or a specific change over time. I'd say the stamps were affected more by the operator and machine settings, combined with wear on the dies. Given they stamped more than a million bikes some years I'd imagine the dies would have to be changed from time to time. For example here is a '73 Continental with a very light stamp:
Yeah, it was that up-side-down blue 80's cruiser that kicked me off, as its stamp sucks in all directions! [grin] , and my 80 black seems not to swell, but, I looked at others too. This set on a late 80 frame 1981 build, and it's tight..
Come to tink on it, I'm tinkin now, that, errors in such things devalues a collectible as, peps like accuracy as much as best original paint too. I mean, like, if they'd put decals on a bike as crappy as some numbers were, who'd pick that 1st? ? Who's Choice bike was built on 'Hangover Monday', and loves it? [grin]
BTW CDS, your's is an MR, my black is an HR, and so, this below, truly really is 'close' in time.. just 1,705 lower, like, within a day or so. An me bets that your build date, on your badge, is 81 too.
Regardless we're getting side tracked, while that brown set Metacortex posted today
raps the subject tight, like earlier, the green, there's no way they'd been stamped on flat pre-molded metal.