This fallacy that you keep trying to perpetuate concerning the "California Cruiser" having multiple configurations for a bike that was only produced for a few months at best is amusing! Just because one bike model has certain parts on it, is in no way an indicator that other models used those same parts during that same time period.
You have stated many times in the past that Schwinn had just used what they had on hand at the time they built the bikes in question. IE: California Cruisers with the clover leaf sprocket instead of the Mag Sprocket. When the fact is that the Mag Sprockets were used on multiple middleweight bikes during that same time period. If your theory had any validity, then we would see the Typhoon, Hollywood, and Heavy Duti models during that same time period with clover leaf sprockets if there was a shortage of inventory as you speculate, and Schwinn just used what was available in a parts bin!
Most of us know, and acknowledge that the catalog pictures were taken months prior to the catalogs being issued. These catalogs were available to the dealers late in the preceding model year. IE a 77 catalog was printed and in the shops for the Christmas season in 76. So we have a 77 catalog showing a Spitfire with a mag sprocket, from a catalog picture that was most likely taken the middle of 76 at the latest for the printing of a 77 catalog. The 77 catalog clearly shows a Spitfire with the "Mag Sprocket". So if Schwinn was already changing the name to the "Spitfire" in the middle of the 76 model year, it just does not make any rational sense that they would still produce "California Cruisers" late in 76 regardless of what parts, and decals were used! And we have seen the early model Spitfires pictures posted that had the mag sprockets!
View attachment 2086918